What's Wrong With The U.S. Economy?

I dunno. And I'm alot smarter than you.
I happen to think that nothing is wrong with out economy. Yet, the makers of the daily aural data (See, previous Posts) that the majority of you assholes get says that something is wrong. Not only "wrong," but the worst financial calamity the entire world has seen in almost a hundred years. Holy shit! That sounds pretty fucking bad, dude.

But what exactly are they saying is wrong? They don't. Because they can't. Listen for yourself (although I know that's asking alot).

Yes; there was a subprime banking problem. And for you morons that didn't read it before, this is why there was a subprime mortgage crisis:

1938 Roosevelt got through a democratically controlled congress Fannie Mae.

1970 Freddie Mac was created by democrats in congress 57-43 Senate and 234-192 House.

1977 the Community Reinvestment Act was passed by the democratic congress (61-39 Senate and 292-143 House) and signed into law by Jimmy Carter. It encourage banks and mortgage lenders to loan money for housing to people who would not otherwise qualify (with Freddie and Fannie backing same by taking the paper).

1995 President Clinton signed the executive order mandating lenders expand their lending for mortgages to sub-prime borrowers (that means people who would not qualify under any criteria in a sane world). Failure to do so would result in the lending institution not having access to federal funds or the quasi governmental Fannie and Freddie.

1999 Republican Senator Phil Gramm pushed through congress deregulation laws (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) removing Depression era laws separating banking, insurance and brokerage activities. (a really stupid move...Black Cloud's opinion) The vote in the Senate was 98-1-1. McCain was the one who did not vote, another republican was the lone no vote. Biden and Harry Reid, who are now saying it's all Bush's fault, voted for the bill. Even Obama this week places the blamed on Gramm, but fails to mention that his running mate voted for it, and Clinton signed it into law.

2003 President Bush tried to get congress to amend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rules to disallow loans to people who would not qualify under normal lending institution rules for making loans. In other words, rescind the Clinton Executive order which had by now become the rules of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The democrats in the Senate (48) used the threat of filibuster to kill the bill (got to have that magic 60 in the Senate to stop a filibuster).

2006 Greenspan testified before congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were both a house of cards and needed a lot more oversight and controls in case this country found itself in a recession in the future. That duty falls to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Democrat Chris Dodd is Chairman. He wasn't thrilled with Greenspan's advice, because he was the number one campaign money receiver from Fannie and Freddie over the years. Obama was number 2, and he raked his largess in two years.

Now Dodd is saying he may go for the 700 billion, but he wants more oversight, which he had in the first place, but doesn't want to point his finger at himself for not doing his job, even when told there was a big problem.

Every single piece of legislation the republicans have put up to regulate the financial industry since 2000 has been killed in the senate by democrats.

95% of the homeowners are paying their monthly mortgage payments. It's those 5% that are facing foreclosure that will cost the taxpayers a trillion dollars.

A look at history to find out where it all began, and why we are in this financial mess.

1938 Roosevelt got through a democratically controlled congress Fannie Mae.

1970 Freddie Mac was created by democrats in congress 57-43 Senate and 234-192 House.

1977 the Community Reinvestment Act was passed by the democratic congress (61-39 Senate and 292-143 House) and signed into law by Jimmy Carter. It encourage banks and mortgage lenders to loan money for housing to people who would not otherwise qualify (with Freddie and Fannie backing same by taking the paper).

1995 President Clinton signed the executive order mandating lenders expand their lending for mortgages to sub-prime borrowers (that means people who would not qualify under any criteria in a sane world). Failure to do so would result in the lending institution not having access to federal funds or the quasi governmental Fannie and Freddie.

1999 Republican Senator Phil Gramm pushed through congress deregulation laws (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) removing Depression era laws separating banking, insurance and brokerage activities. (a really stupid move...Black Cloud's opinion) The vote in the Senate was 98-1-1. McCain was the one who did not vote, another republican was the lone no vote. Biden and Harry Reid, who are now saying it's all Bush's fault, voted for the bill. Even Obama this week places the blamed on Gramm, but fails to mention that his running mate voted for it, and Clinton signed it into law.

2003 President Bush tried to get congress to amend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rules to disallow loans to people who would not qualify under normal lending institution rules for making loans. In other words, rescind the Clinton Executive order which had by now become the rules of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The democrats in the Senate (48) used the threat of filibuster to kill the bill (got to have that magic 60 in the Senate to stop a filibuster).

2006 Greenspan testified before congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were both a house of cards and needed a lot more oversight and controls in case this country found itself in a recession in the future. That duty falls to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Democrat Chris Dodd is Chairman. He wasn't thrilled with Greenspan's advice, because he was the number one campaign money receiver from Fannie and Freddie over the years. Obama was number 2, and he raked his largess in two years.

Now Dodd is saying he may go for the 700 billion, but he wants more oversight, which he had in the first place, but doesn't want to point his finger at himself for not doing his job, even when told there was a big problem.

Every single piece of legislation the republicans have put up to regulate the financial industry since 2000 has been killed in the senate by democrats.

95% of the homeowners are paying their monthly mortgage payments. It's those 5% that are facing foreclosure that will cost the taxpayers a trillion dollars.

The subprime crisis was quickly contained. It was not and never was a crisis. Therefore, it is not now why there is an alleged economic crisis.

For those who follow KK, you already know where I'm going. For the rest of you, I'll summarize what's happening in the hopes that you become so traumatized with sheer confusion that you open the nearest window and jump out of it. Really.

We in the United States are in the midst of a constitutional crisis. At this exact moment, there is a black, muslim, fascist thief illegally in possession of the White House. He was allowed to occupy that position by his cohort fascists in the congress who have refused to challenge his bona fides. So be it.

Barry Cocksucker Hussein is a liar, drug abuser and a thief. He always has been. He was instructed from very early age that the most successful thieves are the elected ones; usually rich white folk that personify a needed lie, then have others repeat and spread the lie through kickbacks, pay-offs and patronage, get elected, and then without firing even one bullet steal, plunder and rob everybody of everything in sight. Americans even carve some of their faces into a granite monument.

That's Barry Cocksucker. Fact is, you don't know a thing about him and he ain't saying, either. So don't start shit with me. I know who he is and I also know what he is.

Cocksucker is using this big lie for his own purposes. That's all that a sociopath knows. That's all that he has ever done in his entire life. Even from what you (not I) know about him, look back and try to find something----anything that he ever did for anyone else at anytime, anywhere, ever.

You can't. Because it never happened.

But what you could find would show you exactly who and exactly what sort of pathetic monster Cocksucker is. It's there, at least alot of it. You could start with the Chicago Sun-Times/Tim Novak chronology and pieces. That's just the easy stuff. But even knowing only that would expose Cocksucker for the lying piece of shit he is.

So, what's wrong with our economy? You are. For being so fucking stupid to know better.

HLS? The Thief Executive Can't Even Spell It!

He is president only because he's black. But still a loser.
He (allegedly) went to Harvard only because he's black. But still a loser.
He became Editor of Law Review only because he's black. We all know that.
How did he get into Harvard Law School, even as a black but a moron? I don't think he was a legacy although the man who fronted for his whore of a mother graduated from Harvard. No, the name of the loser who attended HLS was "Barry Soetero," he was a black but of British citizenship from Kenya. That's why we haven't seen any of Barry's school records, and never will unless some patriot in Cambridge grows a set and puts his whole record on-line.

According to obamacrimes.org, this is what is known about Barack Obama Jr.'s parents and his citizenship.

Barack Obama Jr. aka Barack H. Obama Jr. aka Barry Soetoro aka Barack Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama aka Barack Hussein Obama

Barack Obama Jr.'s mother is Stanley Ann Dunham, aka Ann Dunham, aka Stanley Ann Obama aka Ann Obama, aka Stanley Ann Soetoro, aka Ann Soetoro.

Barack Obama Jr. was born to Barack Obama Sr., a citizen of Kenya and Stanley Ann Dunham, a citizen of the U.S.

Barack Obama Jr.'s mother, Ann Dunham, divorced Barack Obama Jr's father in or about 1963 when Barack Obama Jr was two years old.

Then Barack Obama Jr.'s mother, Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Lolo Soetoro legally acknowledged Barack H. Obama, Jr. et al. as his son and/or adopted him.

While Ann Dunham (Soetoro) aka Stanley Ann Soetoro was married to Lolo Soertoro, Barack Obama Jr. was enrolled in the public school in Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen.

On August 20, 1980, Stanley Ann Soetoro, initiated divorce proceedings from Lolo Soetoro in Honolulu, HI. click here to view court docket

Think what you will about Berg, but he's no dummy. There isn't a single word about Robeson anywhere. Why? It's because, as an attorney, Berg knows that the only way Barry can prove that he is an American and was born on American soil is by proving his relation to Robeson himself. Dummy? Right.

Will the scumbag thief-in-chief do that? He can't do that. By doing that Barry concedes he is a fraud.

At this moment there is a new lawsuit naming the U.S. Congress as defendant for failing to adhere to the 20th Amendment, and seating this cocksucker lying fraud and thief as president. In addition, the United States Supreme Court has refused to hold any hearings or decide any cases submitted to it on the issue.

The remedy for that is not clear. This issue has never arisen before. Indeed, there has never been anyone so deranged, so immoral and just so stupid as to try this in this past.

Barry Cocksucker symbolizes the worst not in Americans, but the worst in human beings. He is on par with Hitler and Stalin; fascists sociopaths who have no respect for anyone else nor any law, culture, institution or the society they're in. In the tiny, warped mind of Barry Cocksucker, the only question he ever asks himself is: "Is this something I can do?" He will do it if he answers himself in the affirmative. And, as a sociopath, he always answers himself in the affirmative.

Now, how did he pay for HLS? He has never worked a real job in his entire life. He had no parents. He had no money. How did he get money to live, eat and travel around the world for those 3 years? Oh, now I remember; Barry Soetero was so famous, so brilliant and so popular that a major publishing house signed him to a very lucrative book deal. And not just for one book you crazy fuck. But for two books. Who was his early editor again? Jane Dystel?

Not surprisingly, Barry never finished even the first book. He was legally in default of his contract. And you know what happens if you default on a contract, don't you? That's right; the publisher not only pays you a bonus, but they extend your deadline, too. So don't ever fuck with those guys if you know what's good for you!

Don't take my word for it, here's one of the publishers' accounts: "The background is that when Obama was elected the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review in 1990 he was contacted by several literary agents, and chose Jane Dystel. He received a substantial advance of more than $100,000 from Simon & Schuster. The book missed its deadline, and when the first two parts did arrive, according to Ferris, the manuscript was rejected as too long and too late."
Gee, who ever knew that a nobody could become a somebody just because he's black? And a $100,000.00 advance to a complete nobody? By a publisher so broke it collapsed 2 years later?

Jane Dystel? Jane Dystal? Where do I know her from?

And why would a broke muslim from Hawaii turn away down single job offer while in HLS and, instead, seek the beauty, comfort and safety of a completely unknown urban Chicago instead? Because, stupid, you've been told to view the chronology through a warped kaleidoscope. Barry didn't attend HLS and then go to chi-town; he was sent by his father, Paul Robeson, to live in Chicago where he could get ghetto, just like dad he thought, as a condition to attending HLS.

A few phone calls later and the deed was done.

Hey, Look; Another Fascist is Banged

A scumbag is a scumbag is a scumbag, she once wrote immortally.

"But Lauren, it's a republican conspiracy!" I know it is. By the way, I see you're healing well from that lobotomy. Stay away from fried foods and you'll be fine.

No, it's not a republican conspiracy. It is the tippy, tippy top of the corruption iceberg now slowly melting under its own heat caused by the rapacious greed of illinois democrat/fascists who have been becoming "politicians" for generations as their weapon of choice to rob, steal and plunder from the taxpayers and from the poor who can't even afford to pay taxes. You don't need a gun. All you need is: 1) a lie; and, 2) a liar to tell it. Enter the democrats.

Blago is now out. But I'm here to tell ya that ain't half the story.
Blago will be dead shortly. Really dead. I'm talking Vince Foster, Robert Brown type dead. Not just dead, but useless dead-- all papers gone, all tapes erased and all evidence buried. That boy knows a little too much about too many people. Including one scumbag who is now president of the United States. Blago became gov because he was the "Chief Thief." He stole things-- everything better than they did, including enough votes ( a la JFK) to "become" the gov.

So what happened? Well, you and I don't really know all of the facts, and we never will. Personally, however, I will be one very happy little lady when that filthy lying cheating thief is dead.

Claiming victory in the 2002 governor's race, a beaming Rod Blagojevich stood in the gritty steel mill where his late father once worked and pledged a new era in corruption-plagued Illinois politics.

The fresh political face with boyish charm and TV-anchor hair became the state's first Democratic governor in 26 years, riding his father-in-law's connections, Republican scandal and a record-setting war chest into power.

"I have seen the anger and I have felt the disappointment in a government that's been more preoccupied with public corruption than public service," Blagojevich told his supporters at A. Finkl & Sons Co., the same Near North Side mill where he had announced his candidacy a year earlier. "It is time for a government that's as good and as honest and as hardworking as the people of this great state."

Little more than six years later, Blagojevich stood before senators, pleading for his political life and asking them to overlook the very same anger and disappointment. His effort failed as the Senate voted unanimously to remove him from office, ending the electoral career of a fork-tongued governor who promised lofty reforms but sunk Illinois to new lows.

Sleep with one eye open, Blago.

THE SECRET OF LIFE

My blog hasn't been around long, and I told you all right up-front exactly what type of blog this is. Keeping in that spirit I will now divulge to you all what the secret of all life is. That is, according to your fascist/democrat neighbor.

It is my opinion that every single ill that this great nation now faces is can be traced to, and is directly attributable to, a relatively small "handful" of people, perhaps fewer than 15 at any one time, who have been creating and steering the actions of government and the policies of the state legislatures since 1960. Who are those people? They are mostly homosexuals and Jewish women. They are people you have never heard of. They are people who, in an industry of ego maniacal sociopaths that have contracts requiring that they each receive "name credit," have contracts that require that they not receive name credit except as required by law. They are openly hateful, intolerant bigots who feed off their own lies, deceptions, intentional mis-truths and deliberate omissions. They are selfish individuals who do not care about what you think, do not care about what is right and do not care about what is the law. That's because they will tell you what to think, what to care about and what should be the law.

They are people who you never voted for, people who were never appointed to any position of authority and people who aren't accountable to anyone for anything that they do although federally licensed and mandated to adhere to a strict set of public policy guidelines.

So, I'll bet you're saying right about now, "Lauren, enough with the bullshit already. Just who the fuck are those scumbags?"

They are the secret of life in America. And in many other places. It is through them, AND ONLY THROUGH THEM, that you and I and everyone else is apprised of aural information. ALL AURAL INFORMATION. Critical information. Information of such great importance that we elect our presidents based on the aural data they create and send us.

They use different means to send their data, too. Many times they use live individuals to speak the data they've made. Typically they will use very attractive and/or very authoritative/scholarly looking individuals. In the beginning, all of the individuals selected to speak the data they made were men. White men. White Catholic men. Today most of the individuals are unkempt, hairy and probably female. Non-white females. Non-white-non-Catholic likely females.

Those people would also print the data they created and then sell it to us in the form of a something called "newspaper," a very interesting misnomer in and by itself.

You are probably familiar with the adage coined by Marshall McLuhan that, "The Medium is the Message," is such a total, complete and powerful observation that only a scant few truly understand its full meaning. Of course, that's because the people who he was referring to, those people make the data, do not want anyone else to know their scheme, or making data or issuing the data. Alchemy, data control and data flow are essential components of their scheme.

Who are those people? Well, that's a good question. I mean, I know exactly who they are and have been. But how do I describe them? How do I explain to you that you have been hoodwinked your entire life, and these are the people responsible for that? How do I explain that you have been sucking at the tit of their data breasts for so long that you no longer know what to think about any practically any social subject, and how? How do I get you to realize that you have been brainwashed by those people so thoroughly, so totally, so completely and for so long that you have absolutely no idea where you could go for pure data? How does one advise another that he is the victim of THE BIGGEST fraud in human history, to date?

Well, that's my cross to bear, isn't it? As with everything else in my miserable existence, I will strive to do my best in the knowledge that the truth is real, something that you as a human being are unable to disgorge from your wiring and, as such, it will light a spark within each of you reading this who "get" it.

The people I am referring to are the people employed as the "network news writers" and, secondarily, "columnists" for newspaper. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE. THAT IS SIMPLY WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED TO BELIEVE THEY DO."

In its simplest terms, they are modern-age alchemists who have fucked with your head, my head and everyone else's head for our entire lives, and getting away with it........until now. You see, those cocksuckers figured out that because it's impossible for you to know any differently, they could create aural data "hot and fresh" each morning and aurally tell you anything they want you to know and think via the aural data they gave the data annunciators to give you. As long as the inner group of alchemists stayed alchemists the flow of aural data would rely on the production of aural data which was determined not by facts and events, but by the individual alchemist who decoded a fact or event into the aural data they deemed fit for their annunciators to give to you. Then they repeat it to you over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again throughout the hour and day.

To insure that you only get "their" data is given to you, it is licensed data with the "seal of approval" from the government to assure your weakened senses that "it's OK; just STFU and listen."

For example, just who the fuck is Barry Cocksucker"? Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies.

'Barry' (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan. During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a 'round the world' trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family. My question -

Where did he get the money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children would have had money for a trip like this when they where in college. When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York. It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry. Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia? It's not cheap! to say the least. Where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000. a year. Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York.

By 'chance' he met Antoin 'Tony' Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named 'Entrepreneur of the Decade' by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association'. About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law School? More student loans? After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented 'Rezar' which is Rezko's firm. Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with 'seed money' for his U.S. Senate race. In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwoood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.

Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he doesn't make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Do we see a pattern here? Or am I going crazy?

On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley advisor to Obama was 'sacked' after the press found out he was having regular contacts with 'Hamas', which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week, buried in the back part of the papers,Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will 'Take care of things'.

Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that where born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those 'small' Internet campaign contribution for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East?

And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on 'This Week' with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on talking about his religion said,'My Muslim faith'. When questioned, 'he made a mistake'. Some mistake!

Why haven't all of our 'intelligent' members of the press been reporting this?

You now know that answer.

THE WSJ AND NOW........EVEN MARK LEVIN!

I'M LOVIN' IT!!! Thank you so much.

The other day I posted that the WSJ published an editorial that mirrored my recent KK post, and it described our philosophy well.

Only a few minutes ago I heard "The Great One" (no, not Jackie Gleason or that shit head phony faggot Artie Lang), say on his radio program that hussein and his gang are: 1) Fascists; and, thieves....precisely as I posted earlier today and yesterday.

Thank you, Mark. Let's both keep up the good fight and clean-out these motherfuckers from our government. We must WIN THIS WAR!

SCUMBAG-IN-CHIEF, "0" MEREDITH VIERA BEWILDERED.

The scumbag-in-chief, huseein, had his balls chewed losing every single Republican member of the House yesterday, and 11 fascists as well. They refused to endorse the scumbag's "democrat porkulus spending bill." The scumbag-in-chief and his cunt House maiden now own this bill lock, stock and barrel.

Congratulations, fascists. You stole the election and then within 30 days evidenced what you are, where you want to go and how you want to get there.

Hang on because it is going to be a very long, very nasty, unprecedented next 3 years, 10 months.

And Meredith, honey, aside from being too stupid, you're way too fat and too ugly for morning TV. Your boy is a flop. Always was. You're just too much of a fucking idiot to know that. Always were.

Stay at home with the cripple. Or is it that you can't stand to be around him?

Immigrate This! You Stupid Fucks.

Want to resolve the immigration debate? Easy. Let's adopt the immigration law of another nation. After all, by implication, that's what the immigration fascists claim as being the better idea. Their immigration law is implicitly better because ours is.............not? OK; let's play.

Whose is better? Just ask any democrat fascist and they'll tell you. Or will they? Apparently they can't. But that's no surprsie. They're democrats, i.e., maniacal, deranged, semi-functional knuckle-draggers incapable of doing anything else except finding fault with everything with anyone who disagrees with them (Tolerance. Right.).

Since they're incapable of deciding, I will. I say let's take Mexico's immigration laws and make them ours. I also think we should incorporate Canada's, Denmark's and Norway's where we can, as well as use Japan's as an overall "default."

That should make a democrat happy, right? I mean, those countries can't all be wrong. We're the bad guys. Not them. Not anyone else. Americans and only Americans.

So now what kind of immigration law do we have? Can any wetback just cross the border and claim citizenship, get welfare, healthcare, daycare, foodstamps, free housing, free college and feee education in even one of any of those countries?

Think again, shit for brains.

The WSJ Reads "KILLER KONSERVATIVE."

Yesterday the Wall Street Journal published an editorial that mirrored my recent blog entry entitled, "HEY YOU--- SHIT FOR BRAINS!." I wonder what that portends?

• JANUARY 26, 2009

How Modern Law Makes Us Powerless

By PHILIP K. HOWARD

Calling for a "new era of responsibility" in his inaugural address, President Barack Obama reminded us that there are no limits to "what free men and women can achieve." Indeed. America achieved greatness as the can-do society. This is, after all, the country of Thomas Paine and barn raisings, of Grange halls and Google. Other countries shared, at least in part, our political freedoms, but America had something different -- a belief in the power of each individual. President Obama's clarion call of self-determination -- "Yes We Can" -- hearkens back to the core of our culture.

David Klein

But there's a threshold problem for our new president. Americans don't feel free to reach inside themselves and make a difference. The growth of litigation and regulation has injected a paralyzing uncertainty into everyday choices. All around us are warnings and legal risks. The modern credo is not "Yes We Can" but "No You Can't." Our sense of powerlessness is pervasive. Those who deal with the public are the most discouraged. Most doctors say they wouldn't advise their children to go into medicine. Government service is seen as a bureaucratic morass, not a noble calling. Make a difference? You can't even show basic human kindness for fear of legal action. Teachers across America are instructed never to put an arm around a crying child.

The idea of freedom as personal power got pushed aside in recent decades by a new idea of freedom -- where the focus is on the rights of whoever might disagree. Daily life in America has been transformed. Ordinary choices -- by teachers, doctors, officials, managers, even volunteers -- are paralyzed by legal self-consciousness. Did you check the rules? Who will be responsible if there's an accident? A pediatrician in North Carolina noted that "I don't deal with patients the same way any more. You wouldn't want to say something off the cuff that might be used against you."

Here we stand, facing the worst economy since the Great Depression, and Americans no longer feel free to do anything about it. We have lost the idea, at every level of social life, that people can grab hold of a problem and fix it. Defensiveness has swept across the country like a cold wave. We have become a culture of rule followers, trained to frame every solution in terms of existing law or possible legal risk. The person of responsibility is replaced by the person of caution. When in doubt, don't.

All this law, we're told, is just the price of making sure society is in working order. But society is not working. Disorder disrupts learning all day long in many public schools -- the result in part, studies by NYU Professor Richard Arum found, of the rise of student rights. Health care is like a nervous breakdown in slow motion. Costs are out of control, yet the incentive for doctors is to order whatever tests the insurance will pay for. Taking risks is no longer the badge of courage, but reason enough to get sued. There's an epidemic of child obesity, but kids aren't allowed to take the normal risks of childhood. Broward County, Fla., has even banned running at recess.

The flaw, and the cure, lie in our conception of freedom. We think of freedom as political freedom. We're certainly free to live and work where we want, and to pull the lever in the ballot box. But freedom should also include the power of personal conviction and the authority to use your common sense. Analyzing the American character, Alexis de Tocqueville, considered "freedom less necessary in great things than in little ones. . . . Subjection in minor affairs does not drive men to resistance, but it crosses them at every turn, till they are led to sacrifice their own will. Thus their spirit is gradually broken and their character enervated."

This is not an ideological point. Freedom in daily choices is essential for practical reasons -- necessary for government officials and judges as well as for teachers, doctors and entrepreneurs. The new legal order doesn't honor the individuality of human accomplishment. People accomplish things by focusing on the goal, and letting their instincts, mainly subconscious, try to get them there. "Amazingly few people," management guru Peter Drucker observed, "know how they get things done." Most things happen, the philosopher Michael Polanyi wrote, through "the usual process of trial and error by which we feel our way to success." Thomas Edison put it this way: "Nothing that's any good works by itself. You got to make the damn thing work."

Modern law pulls the rug out from under all those human powers and substitutes instead a debilitating self-consciousness. Teachers lose their authority, Prof. Arum found, because the overhang of law causes "hesitation, doubt and weakening of conviction." Skyrocketing health-care costs are impossible to contain as long as doctors go through the day thinking about how they will defend themselves if a sick person sues.

The overlay of law on daily choices destroys the human instinct needed to get things done. Bureaucracy can't teach. Rules don't make things happen. Accomplishment is personal. Anyone who has felt the pride of a job well done knows this.

How do we restore Americans' freedom in daily choices? Freedom is notoriously malleable towards self-interest. "We all declare for liberty," Abraham Lincoln observed, "but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing."

Freedom, however, is not just a shoving match. Freedom has a formal structure. It has two components:

1) Law sets boundaries that proscribe what we must do or can't do -- you must not steal, you must pay taxes.

2) Those same legal boundaries protect an open field of free choice in all other matters.

The forgotten idea is the second component -- that law must affirmatively define an area free from legal interference. Law must provide "frontiers, not artificially drawn," as philosopher Isaiah Berlin put it, "within which men should be inviolable."

This idea has been lost to our age. When advancing the cause of freedom, law today is all proscription and no protection. There are no boundaries, just a moving mudbank comprised of accumulating bureaucracy and whatever claims people unilaterally choose to assert. People wade through law all day long. Any disagreement in the workplace, any accident, any incidental touching of a child, any sick person who gets sicker, any bad grade in school -- you name it. Law has poured into daily life.

The solution is not just to start paring back all the law -- that would take 10 lifetimes, like trying to prune the jungle. We need to abandon the idea that freedom is a legal maze, where each daily choice is like picking the right answer on a multiple-choice test. We need to set a new goal for law -- to define an open area of free choice. This requires judges and legislatures to affirmatively assert social norms of what's reasonable and what's not. "The first requirement of a sound body of law," Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. wrote, "is that it should correspond with the actual feelings and demands of the community."

The profile of authority structures needed to defend daily freedoms is not hard to imagine. Judges would aspire to keep lawsuits reasonable, understanding that what people sue for ends up defining the boundaries of free interaction. Schools would be run by the instincts and values of the humans in charge -- not by bureaucratic micromanagement -- and be held accountable for how they do. Government officials would have flexibility to meet public goals, also with accountability. Public choices would aspire to balance for the common good, not, generally, to appease someone's rights.

Reviving the can-do spirit that made America great requires a legal overhaul of historic dimension. We must scrape away decades of accumulated legal sediment and replace it with coherent legal goals and authority mechanisms, designed to affirmatively protect individual freedom in daily choices. "A little rebellion now and then is a good thing," Thomas Jefferson wrote to James Madison, "and as necessary in the political world as storms are in the physical . . . ." The goal is not to change our public goals. The goal is make it possible for free citizens to achieve them.

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A15 Copyright 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Yeah, right.

Actually, the precise goal of those cocksuckers in congress is to wrest all decision making from you, and you're letting them do a pretty good job of that. Their game plan is simple and exposed. Indeed, they're democrats. All you need to know is one name: Herbert Marcuse. Is that so fucking hard for you nitwits? Are you so stupid that you can no longer read? Or think? Or reason? We know that's the case if you're a democrat. But if you're not, and if you have any sense of self respect and any need to be treated in life as an adult rather than a retarded 6 year old (e.g., democrats), learn more about that cocksucker, how he emigrated from Germany, and exactly where he immigrated to. If you're anything except a democrat, I think it will truly blow your fucking mind!

The current cocksucker-in-chief hussein isn't intelligent enough to comprehend Marcuse, but he was able to ingest the signals received from his father, Paul Robeson. Oh, I'm sorry; did you think his father was "Barack Obama, Sr.?" You silly fucking moron. BO Sr. received a Harvard education in exchange for his complicity in Pappy Dunham's plan to forever clear out the field negroes. See, Pappy Dunham had two big problems. Himself and his daughter, a whore named STANLEY ANN DUNHAM. It's fairly safe to say that nobody in their right fucking mind ever named a daughter "Stanley," especially not back in 1945. But Pappy did. Why? Because Pappy was a deranged yet functional individual. And Stanley became an angry young woman as a result. The apple didn't fall far from the tree, either. Little 'ol Stanley displayed her angst toward dear 'ol Pappy by spreading for the neighborhood blacks as soon as Momma wasn't around to stop her (maybe at 13 0r 14). One of them was Paul Robeson. It is believed that he and his white wife raped (only in the statutory sense) and impregnated Stanley with who would become Barry (Obama is a bullshit name). In fact, this incident is even documented in one of Robeson's books. But the whore couldn't marry Robeson. He was already tethered to a different white woman. What to do? What to do? I know!! Let's find a really, really "smart" negro who actually doesn't live anywhere close to us to lend his name. Fuck, if the father is gonna be a black why not make it one of those "smart" ones? Enter Barack Obama. Obama was not an American. He was from Kenya, and through the largess of one of the influential people Momma met while she worked for a bank she was able to arrange for BO's fully paid educational escapade at Harvard (and exit visa back to Africa) in exchange for him marrying their little whore to provide needed social cover. After all, it was 1961.

It was a pretty good plan. But there was just one small problem. We all know you can't trust them people, especially those smart fuckers. It turned out that BO was actually already married....to two (2) different woman at the same time! Neither Momma or Pappy knew that until it was too late. BO was already attending Harvard by the time those two schmucks discovered the problem. Outsmarted by their very own newly minted son-in-law, what were they going to do now? Little Barry was about to drop anchor and the whore still needed a husband.

Well, what could be even better than having a negro for a husband? Exactly; a negro who you just call your husband. There's no muss, and no fuss. Phew, that was easy!
And, yeah; that's why the cocksucker-in-chief can't produce his Birth Certificate.
Of course, immediately after delivering little Barry the little whore did what all whores do, she flees and she abandons her newborn into the hands of her "loving," responsible and attentive white parents. Pappy always wanted a son (that's why he named her "Stanley"). Well, he just got one.

So, let's review a moment. Barry Obama is born out of wedlock. His father, who raped his mother, can't come forward openly. His mother, now all of 17 years old, is still too much the whore to stay in one place while shackled to the responsibilities of a child (i.e., a "mistake" in BO's terms) and flees to the arms of yet another man 10,000 miles away. The man who they arrange to marry the whore and to act as his father, and who Barry is named after, turns out to be a bigamist and philanderer and is also now half a world away back in Kenya. And now it's just little black Barry all alone with his loving white Grandmother and Grandfather living in Hawaii, a state well-known for its abundance of blacks and mixed-race, mixed-generation households.

Despite that picture of paradise, in reality Pappy Dunham was now raising the son he always wanted. Or did he?

In actual fact it is well documented that Pappy Dunham consented to frequent, fixed visitation rights with Robeson. It's unknown at this point if that was voluntary or coerced in some manner by Robeson. Regardless, the fact remains the same. For many years Pappy Dunham gave Barry over to Robeson to raise both culturally and educationally.

You may be saying to yourself at this point, "Lauren, what the fuck does this have to do with Herbert Marcuse?" I'm glad you asked! Kinda.
See, if you have to ask then it's already proof that you're just another illiterate. Robeson was a rabid communist and "black theologist" (although there cannot be such a thing). He schooled little Barry in the ways of Marx, Engel, Cone, Alinsky and............Marcuse.

The reason that Marcuse is central to all others is because of the theory that gave him notoriety, namely: "I have the right to say, think, do and feel any fucking way I want. So do you, but only if it doesn't conflict with me," is the social norm for today's democrats. That, kiddies, is the Marcuse "school" in a nutshell. That scumbag believed that there mustn't be any constraints of free thought in a democratic and civilized society. That's another way of saying that people should "tolerate absolutely nothing they disagree with, and they should disagree with everything that they don't want to tolerate." i.e., I'm right, fuck you.

It appeals to the masses because it sanctions the human weakness and temptation to be selfish and/or self-centered. You, and only how you feel, matters. As long as everybody else agrees, it's great. If all that matters is how you feel rather than needing a valid reason to feel that way, there are no longer any boundaries and norms for people to accord themselves to.

From there blossomed the culture of victimhood; women's rights, gay rights, children's rights, animal rights, environmental rights, affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and on and on and on to the point where it is perceived by at least as many voters as needed to steal an election for the big-daddy government to take care of all of your needs and to make sure everyone else behaves in a way that doesn't impede your right to be a queer on Thursday, bigamist on Friday and a pedophile every other Monday.

In other words, a democrat, socialist motherfucker just like hussein.
You may have already deduced that in order for hussein and his band of fascists to be successful they, like all marxists and fascists, need an "already existing successful economy" who they will then label the enemy. Why? because stupid, democrat marxist fascists like hussein are thieves, not ideologues. They simply use and hide behind the pretext of politics as their "weapon of choice" with which they will rob, steal and pilfer from us until there is nothing of any value left remaining.

PEOPLE---WE ARE AT WAR!! WE ARE AT WAR WITH AN ENEMY THAT IS ALREADY HERE AND WORKING FROM THE INSIDE-OUT.

This is probably a good place to ask you bone-headed asshole democrat/fascists this: When the murderous drunken scumbag Kennedy (no, not William, not Caroline, not Patrick, not the stupid dead John-John either-- I mean Ted) finally got a terminal brain tumor that will finally kill that piece of shit, did he run to Havana for medical treatment? How about when BJ clinton needed open-heart surgery: did that piece of shit scumbag run to Havana for medical treatment? Why didn't either one of them go to Cuba for the best health care this world has to offer? Has even one democrat media outlet ever posed that question?

We (meaning us Conservatives and Republicans) already knew the answer. Of course they didn't. The point is, look at what castro did to the generations of fine Cuban people, all in the name of fascism. And despite the poverty, the despair, the abysmal health care situation, the complete and utter absence of any semblance of an economy, the democrat media and democrat/fascists anti-americans in this country laud castro as a hero.

But what of castro's wealth? Or raoul's? Or arrafat's cunt-wife's enormous stash in Paris, Luxembourg and elsewhere? How about Kadaffi? And what about that slimy, greasy wetback motherfucker in Venezuela? All filthy rich. And each one a bigger bigot and liar than the other.

Just like barry hussein is now. Fascists can't get rich by stealing from the poor. To succeed they must invade a thriving economy, one that has assets already available for them to steal. From there, all they do is sell dissent and class warfare by paying-off the throngs of losers with a vote (i.e., ACORN types) with the promise to "get even" with all those "rich people." You know, conservatives and republicans and everyone else earning more than $50,000.00 a year . Everyone except, of course, the fascists who are leading the parade.

Finally, and to come full circle, they not only steal all of the wealth, they change all of the laws that created that wealth. When I tell you we are at war I am dead serious.

The solution?

Well, hopefully hussein won't make it more than a few months anyway. He's so dirty himself that it is easy to imagine a day very, very soon when the US Supreme Court finally orders that cocksucker to put up or shut up; either produce your birth certificate or get the fuck out of the Oval Office and declare the election void.
Otherwise, it is the duty of every American to defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. Why do you think those great minds used those exact words?????

Because they were great minds. It isn't difficult to envision the precise scenario we are suffering with today, or the possibility of being infiltrated from within.

People, it's up to you. At least it right now until the cocksucker in chief packs the courts and changes the law of the land forever.

Do whatever you can do to stop it. As that fat stupid fuck Gore said when he was busted for taking political contributions from Nuns, the ends justify the means.

Democrats: The Scourge of the World

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

Democrats have been in control of Congress since 2006, and will continue to run things for the next four years with a democrat as president, so the recession should last at least that long. That's because the economic philosophy of the Democratic Party is to subsidize failure and punish success. Bailing out auto companies that couldn't make money in good times, and raising taxes on those job creators who are still making money may be good for gathering votes, but not for growing an economy.
Democrats caused our financial crisis by requiring Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other lenders to make risky loans to those who were not qualified. This policy was put into force during the Clinton Administration. Senator John McCain in 2005 tried to get Congress to have Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac return to sound loan granting policies. Obama, and other democrats refused.

Franklin Raines, CEO of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) from 1999-2004, is the individual most responsible for the subprime mortgage crisis. Under Raines, Fannie Mae committed 'extensive financial fraud.' It was on Mr. Raines' watch that Fannie Mae went bankrupt. Franklin Raines has taken calls from Barack Obama's presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing matters."

Mr. Jim Johnson, the former Fannie Mae chairman, who helped with the screening process for Obama's VP, and Mr. Raines aren't the only figures in the subprime mortgage scandal to be connected to the Obama campaign. Jamie Gorelick, rumored to be an attorney general candidate in an Obama administration, was vice chairman of Fannie Mae from 1997 to 2003. Penny Pritzker, Mr. Obama's national finance chairman, has been described as "the Michael Milken of the subprime mortage crisis" for her pioneering of the packaging of bad loans with good ones at her now defunct Superior bank in suburban Chicago.
A look at history to find out where it all began, and why we are in this financial mess.

1938 Roosevelt got through a democratically controlled congress Fannie Mae.

1970 Freddie Mac was created by democrats in congress 57-43 Senate and 234-192 House.

1977 the Community Reinvestment Act was passed by the democratic congress (61-39 Senate and 292-143 House) and signed into law by Jimmy Carter. It encourage banks and mortgage lenders to loan money for housing to people who would not otherwise qualify (with Freddie and Fannie backing same by taking the paper).

1995 President Clinton signed the executive order mandating lenders expand their lending for mortgages to sub-prime borrowers (that means people who would not qualify under any criteria in a sane world). Failure to do so would result in the lending institution not having access to federal funds or the quasi governmental Fannie and Freddie.

1999 Republican Senator Phil Gramm pushed through congress deregulation laws (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) removing Depression era laws separating banking, insurance and brokerage activities. (a really stupid move...Black Cloud's opinion) The vote in the Senate was 98-1-1. McCain was the one who did not vote, another republican was the lone no vote. Biden and Harry Reid, who are now saying it's all Bush's fault, voted for the bill. Even Obama this week places the blamed on Gramm, but fails to mention that his running mate voted for it, and Clinton signed it into law.

2003 President Bush tried to get congress to amend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rules to disallow loans to people who would not qualify under normal lending institution rules for making loans. In other words, rescind the Clinton Executive order which had by now become the rules of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The democrats in the Senate (48) used the threat of filibuster to kill the bill (got to have that magic 60 in the Senate to stop a filibuster).

2006 Greenspan testified before congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were both a house of cards and needed a lot more oversight and controls in case this country found itself in a recession in the future. That duty falls to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Democrat Chris Dodd is Chairman. He wasn't thrilled with Greenspan's advice, because he was the number one campaign money receiver from Fannie and Freddie over the years. Obama was number 2, and he raked his largess in two years.

Now Dodd is saying he may go for the 700 billion, but he wants more oversight, which he had in the first place, but doesn't want to point his finger at himself for not doing his job, even when told there was a big problem.

Every single piece of legislation the republicans have put up to regulate the financial industry since 2000 has been killed in the senate by democrats.

95% of the homeowners are paying their monthly mortgage payments. It's those 5% that are facing foreclosure that will cost the taxpayers a trillion dollars.

Alex Bennett: Another Dumb Jew Democrat

From time to time I listen to Sirius "Left" to get my fill of daily idiocracy. Today did not disappoint, especially after listening to Alex Bennett. Those of you lucky enough to not know who that is (and there's no reason on Earth why you should), Bennett was a former host on one of cable's very early porn programs in New York called, "Midnight Blue." He's done very little since that program was taken off cable over 20 years ago, and for good reason.
Alex Bennett is not his real name. Bennett changed his name because he says it was too "Jewy." Of course, Bennett isn't Jewish, either; yes, he was born Jewish. Bennett successfully followed in his parents footsteps who also amounted to nothing, his father being a very low level labor boss and late night band player, and his mother who did even less. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that Bennett turned out to be an angry loser just like mom and dad. Today, Bennett is a 70-something year old paid opportunist and contrarian who espouses opinions that he hopes will resonate with fellow losers, opportunists and contrarians. Bennett represents what the media has devolved into; a platform for bigots who do not need nor want fact in order to produce a political talk program. Opinions stated as fact and opinions believed to be fact is just as good. In fact, it's even better. At least for people like Bennett and his ilk.
When you listen to Bennett "discuss" the economy or Israel you either need to be a functional moron like Bennett or someone with a great sense of humor just to survive getting through it. Like every other liberal living in their own bubble, Bennett has no factual basis for what he says during his program. Sure, Bennett is fully entitled to espouse his own opinion but he is too much of a coward and fraud to acknowledge what it is. In other words, another dumb Jew democrat.

Another Dick Smoker, Another Democrat

I guess news from Oregon travels slowly. That is, if it's about a dick smoker pedophile democrat politician.

Despite the rumors, Samuel Adams, 45, coasted to victory in his race for mayor of portland, making Portland the largest U.S. city to ever elect an openly criminal pedophile democrat. He was sworn in Jan. 1. The AP failed to mention that Adams is a democrat.

Good job you cocksuckers! I mean you pole tossers in portland. You must all get AIDS and die. You are all worthless mounds of carbon of far greater value to society dead than alive.

Getting back to the story, the cocksucker said he and the teen were together in the summer of 2005, shortly after the teenager turned 18 in June, and when Adams was a city commissioner. The revelations come nearly a year and a half after Adams and the teen said rumors of a sexual relationship between them were false.

"I lied at the time because I was afraid that people would believe untrue rumors being circulated by an undeclared mayoral opponent that I had broken a law involving sexual relations with a minor. But this is not a good excuse," Adams said in his statement.

As we know, the lie and the truth are indistinguishable to a democrat; that's one thing which makes them a democrat.

This all follows the news last week that the Racine, Wisconsin Mayor Gary Becker (Democrat) was also arrested on charges of attempted second-degree sexual assault of a child, child enticement and possession of child pornography.

I guarantee that within two years some queer from the left testicle (coast) will marry an animal, with the chief bone licker obama presiding over the ceremony.

Guess Who?

I'll bet you won't.
I'll bet you can't! Why? Because:
She has no living parents.
She has no living grandparents. The last living one conveniently died recently.
She has no proof of who she was born to. Or where. Or when.
She won't let you see her medical records.
She had multiple fathers/step-fathers.
She won't let you see her college records, or what name she used.
She won't let you see her post college records, or what name she used to get in.
She has never written anything even scholastically related, despite being the editor of a literary publication.
She has never argued a case in court or written a brief for a client.
She has never had a job, except as an associate in a law firm dedicated to representing lobbyists, slumlords and thieves who preyed on the poorest people in her neighborhood, and left them without heat or hot water in the winter.
She lives in a mansion.
The only friends she has are convicted or un-indicted terrorists, thieves, bigots, anti-semites and professed American hating, socialist radicals who live to see the obliteration of the United States.
She was instrumental in organizing groups to engage in rampant voter fraud from coast to coast.
She's too weak-minded to even quit smoking, but believed more powerful than any other person alive.
But, she's a democrat. In other words, a figment of the deranged vision of mentally ill individuals sufficient in number to defeat the voices of responsible, moral and hard working members of society.

Democrats (i.e., America's assholes) have taken the piece of shit described above and voted it for president.

Nothing else really needs to be said. That says it all.

HEY YOU--- SHIT FOR BRAINS!

That's right, you.
Another asshole who believes she's so fucking smart because mommy said so and 'cause you got an "A" when actually you plagiarized that paper in college. Well, you're just an asshole. Don't feel bad because you're not only an asshole, but another asshole.
Why? Jeez, where should I begin?
Being able to exist, to hold a job, watch TV, grocery shop surf the web and get laid are hardly attributes to brag about. Unless you're an American younger than 30. The fact is, like almost all other Americans of that bracket you're a walking, talking, working, fucking, eating, shitting, ipod carrying retard who possesses just the information required to barely exist. You're a functional moron; someone dependent on others for every facet of your physical, intellectual, material and emotional existence and content to be in that position. Indeed, you're too fucking stupid to know any different.
Every moment of every day in your worthless life you allow other people to tell you what to think, what to believe, what to eat, what to wear, where to work, how to get there, who to fuck, what to read, what to watch and what to say.
You are weak minded and lazy, unwilling and unable to be responsible for yourself and G-d knows completely incapable of caring for anyone else.
You made a faustinian deal to abdicate your self in this equation of life in exchange for letting someone else make all of the decisions about what you will know, what you will think, what you will like, what you will do, where you will work, what you will be paid, what you will wear, watch, eat and read, who you will marry and every other material decision that affects your existence.
No? Thanks for proving my point. I told you that you're an asshole. Now STFU and learn why you're nothing more than an unnecessary collection of carbon wasting important resources.
I defy you to tell me even one thing that is incorrect.
In America, ever since the democrats, socialists and the liberals took root here around 1960, they have very slowly but very successfully corrupted every single facet of our existence. We no longer live in the United States of America; we live someplace that very carefully left in tact the perception of living in what was the United States of America a free country while eroding and, in many instances, eliminating the American citizen's right to exist as they choose within in the bounds of the laws of a civilized society.
There is not one single area of life that the democrat/socialist/liberal has not invaded and regulated since the 1960's to the point where, today, people in Seattle Washington are being killed because the vermin known as the democrat/socialist/liberal ("SDL") enacted laws BANNING the use of salt on roads during the winter because, the brilliant electorate were "told," salt may be harmful to fish when th water runs off back into the environment. In the mind of a demented and demonic sdl, a fish is more important than your child, or your father and mother who will now be killed while driving, without regard to all of the social and economic damage associated with each one of those unnecessary tragedies.
But of course, no human life is important to the sdl anyway. They have murdered over 60 million Americans.
That was only one, bad example. The fact is you cannot wake up in the morning and get out of your driveway without being victim to a thousand or more different laws and/or local, state and federal regulations. It is because weak minded, lazy assholes like you have given into the temptation of allowing sdl's to make all of your life's decisions for you. The problem is, you are so self-centered, stupid and selfish you didn't consider what effect your vote would have on me. Well, thank you very much. NOW DIE YOU COCKSUCKER.
From the thread count in your sheets, fire retardation of your jammies, chemicals used to dye the toothpaste and toilet paper you use (hopefully), tarrifs on the tea and coffee you drink, regulations about the news you are told on TV, the thousands of codes that were involved in building the home you're in, the thousands of laws regarding the clothing you wear (import restrictions, fabric content regulations, country of origin agreements, shipping laws, labor laws, labeling laws, and consumer laws for selling them), the hundreds of laws that exist telling you where you MUST send your child to school, what she must be taught, who must teach it to her, when, and for how long; to the thousands and thousands and thousands of laws and regulations regulating your car, your driving, your parking, your gas, your insurance, tires, headlight beam strength it must be.
Democrats have become the mother to all only Alfred Hitchcock could love.
Sadly, because their vicious plans have been embraced for the past 50 years, most people have been taught to be too stupid to know any better, or to care. There is no need to know. There is no need to care. That would only be competition to the democrats. Instead, they will think for you. They literally do not care and never will. They literally couldn't care less about you. To a deranged mind, you are an audience, and you exist solely to support the actor-democrat; to applaud their work and trumpet their brilliance as they perform their scripted vision of what your life should be. As with actors when their performance is finished, they want no part of you. You are a gross reminder of a performance from the past yet too stupid to understand any of the dynamics that cause your subservience.
Go moron, wait in line for the next event of your existence.

ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD DIE

I know you are just dying to say that! So I did it for you.
The fact of the matter is, practically every single ill with this nation was caused by a democrat. Today, every failed state (nearly every) has been run into the ground by the corrupt democrats, and now they need to be bailed-out by the biggest thief and liar of all communists, hussein.
Democrats are the scourge of the world. The democrat party is the collection point of the mentally ill in America who are saddled with extreme personality disorders. They are simply incapable of "caring" about the truth because they only care about themself. That's why a democrat never lets the facts get in the way of their lie.
So, again, I dare all of you pussy democrats to challenge the foregoing, and discuss each of the States and/or federal or local government programs such as social security that are completely broke and in debt. Every single one with rare exception is democrat.
And by the way, how about accounting for all of the Katrina money while you're at it? Another example of democrat incompetence costing American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars going to corrupt democrat politicians who have stolen/padded almost all of it.